Hermeneutics Course — Ronald W. Leigh, Ph.D.
Copyright © 2000, 2017 Ronald W. Leigh
May 13, 2017
*F. F. Bruce comments on the place of exegesis: "There can be no true biblical theology unless it is based on sound biblical exegesis, and there can be no sound biblical exegesis unless a firm textual and grammatical foundation has been laid for it." (from the "Foreword to New One-volume Edition" of W. E. Vine's An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words, The Old-time Gospel Hour, 1952)
Our English word exegesis is a transliteration of the Greek word εχηγησις (exēgēsis) which means narration, explanation, or interpretation. It is found as a verb in John 1:18 which says that Jesus has made the Father known (explained or revealed).
The opposite of exegesis is eisegesis – note the different prefixes – ex means out of, eis means into. So exegesis refers to getting the meaning out of the text, while eisegesis refers to reading one's own meaning into the text.
Biblical hermeneutics involves principles and rules of interpretation. Where do these principles and rules come from?
When we use a chart, such as the one above, to show elements built upon other elements, we usually intend to show that each supporting element makes a significant contribution to the element "sitting" upon it and may even be absolutely essential and controlling for that element. In other words, systematic theology is (or should be) totally dependent on biblical theology, which is (or should be) derived from exegesis, which follows (or should) the rules of biblical hermeneutics.
However, the rules and principles of biblical hermeneutics are different (thus the gap in the chart). Of course, hermenertics is, in a sense, dependent on the bottom line of elements (for you must have something to interpret). Yet hermeneutics is not at all governed by the canon, textual criticism, or historical criticism. Rather, biblical hermeneutics has two principal sources:
For additional elements related to hermeneutics, see Direct Bible Discovery, chapter 6.